The Low Bar Squat is Not an Exercise

Image
- 1992, 1996, and 2000 Olympic champion Kakhi Kakhiasvilis performing a squat the way it should be done.

     I know that what I am about to write will piss some people off, but I’m an old man, 66, and don’t have anything to lose. I also know that many people will disagree with what I am about to say and it is certainly their right to disagree. What I have to say is only one man’s opinion, but it’s the opinion of a man who’s been around the block a few times with this iron game.
     Lately, from several sources, I have noticed that the so called ‘low bar’ squat is being taught as a legitimate way to perform an exercise that many people (myself included) consider to be the best and most productive exercise that can be performed with a barbell. This ‘low bar’ squat style seems to be particularly prevalent in some CrossFit circles. I have also had people show up at my gym performing squats in this style after reading about it in a certain book.
     I will start my argument by stating that after well over 50 years as a competitive lifter, coach, and gym owner, I have never seen a top-ranked bodybuilder, Olympic lifter, or serious track or football athlete doing low bar squats.
     The squat movement, whether it be high bar full back squats, front squats, half or quarter squats, or Hatfield bar squats, to my mind, should be about developing and strengthening the quadriceps, as well as the glutes. The high bar squat, when done properly, should not involve the hamstrings much at all. These muscles should be developed with straight legged deadlifts and Good Mornings (always with the knees slightly unlocked) as well as the various leg curling and glute ham gastroc movements. The hamstrings are also strongly involved in Olympic lifting movements such as snatches, cleans, and pulls.
     I can remember the first powerlifting meet held in Georgia at the old Butler Street YMCA in Atlanta in December 1965. It drew a diverse crew of bodybuilders, Olympic lifters, and men who already considered themselves powerlifters. As one can imagine, all kinds of squat styles were used. A few years later virtually everyone at powerlifting meets were setting up with the bar half way down their deltoids, using a relatively wide foot stance and barely breaking parallel; and this is as it should have been. Squatting in this style allows one to lift the most weight while staying within the parameters of the rules for the squat movement in competition.
     In the old days at Coffee’s Gym in the 1980’s, the powerlifters would do high bar squats until about a month out from the competition, at which time they would put on their super suits, widen their foot stance, and set up with the bar half way down their shoulders. Immediately they would squat 100-200 pounds more than they’d been doing on the high bar squat. After the competition they’d go back to their high bar squat routine. Not only did these men become very strong in the squat movement, they also possessed very good quadricep development.
     In closing, I would like to say that most trainers should stick to high bar squats, front squats, or squats with the Hatfield bar if it’s strong legs and good quadricep development you seek. If it’s the posterior chain you want to strengthen and develop, stick with Romanian deadlifts, Good Mornings, Olympic lift movements, as well as hyperextensions and various leg curls.
      The low bar squat is not an exercise for leg development; it’s a way of doing a strength feat that allows a man or woman to lift the most weight while staying within the rules for the lift, but it’s not a movement that those who wish to develop leg strength for sports or to improve the shape and appearance of their legs has any business doing.
     If one wishes to develop real leg strength, every effort should be made to keep the torso upright when squatting. When the torso is inclined forward, much of the effort is transferred to the butt, lower back, and hamstrings. This is not what we want. I would also like to add that all squatting and pulling movements should be performed with the back strongly and rigidly arched. In my opinion the very best test and developer of real leg strength is the full front squat with the back strongly arched. The full high bar squat is not far behind. The low bar back squat is not even on the list.

John B. Coffee
USA Weightlifting Senior International Coach

22 comments
  1. arturo said:

    Thank you. Clarification please. In closing you stated that the front squat with a rigid arch is best. Do you mean in trunk flexion or extension? Thank you.

  2. Rob said:

    Mr. Coffee,
    What originally sold me on the low bar back position was an in-depth explanation on how the anatomy and leverage systems of the body interacted with external weights. I have been an x-ray tech for almost ten years and that type of delivery is what worked best for me I suppose. I am a fan of the mindset, “If it’s not broken, don’t try and fix it”, and believe that if you have never seen a, “top-ranked bodybuilder, Olympic lifter, or serious track or football athlete doing low bar squats”, then whatever they ARE doing is obviously working well for them. I want to know more about the high bar position and was wondering if you know of any books that go in depth on the anatomy of the body and what is happening in the body during a high bar position like you explained.

    Thank you for your response,
    -Rob

  3. Andy said:

    Rippetoe would not be happy. I agree 100%

  4. Pingback: FRONT SQUAT

  5. I have recently added more front squats to my training in an attempt to get away from low bar back squats. I’ve noticed it had taken some range of motion out of my oly lifts! I had a hunch, but I think this solidifies it.

  6. Adrienne said:

    I agree. I did SS with the low-bar squat, squatting just below parallel, for about seven months until I started training and competing as a weightlifter. When I switched to high-bar squats and the olympic lifts, I was shocked at how weak I was from the bottom position to just below parallel. It has taken me an entire year of training to be able to high-bar squat the same weight that I was low-bar squatting. It was like starting over.

  7. butthead said:

    Some truth to this

  8. Caesar said:

    I like this revelation. It shows a disconnect between generations and the bad effects of the information age. People will go off of what they see without really understanding WHY it is the way it is. Thank you for sharing this

  9. Joe said:

    I’m glad to see this written. I low-bar squatted for damn near 20 years, and probably wrong at that! After just getting introduced to the Olympic lifts earlier this year via Crossfit, all those years of low-bar squatting did nothing but instill bad habits I’ve had to break. It feels like I’m having to start all over again. My first overhead squat felt so damn awkward, and I’m sure I looked like an idiot doing it!
    This information is not broadly known in the strength and fitness circles, and I’ve only recently learned that there even was a distinction between high-bar and low-bar squats.

    Yes, Mark Rippetoe would not like this. But then again, his articles glorifying the low-bar squat are all over Crossfit forums, the irony being that Crossfit endorses this type of squatting while struggling to help athletes achieve PR’s in the snatch and clean&jerk.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,591 other followers

%d bloggers like this: